Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Diego County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 110
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Diego County, California totaled $6,571,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Fleur-de-lis Farms LLC | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $5,893 |
82 | Frulla Inc | Temecula, CA 92593 | $4,946 |
83 | Oro Verde Groves Inc | Escondido, CA 92027 | $4,924 |
84 | Rainbow Art Gardens Inc | Temecula, CA 92593 | $4,438 |
85 | Honey Bee Ranch LLC | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $4,157 |
86 | Fabio Peraro | Oceanside, CA 92057 | $4,050 |
87 | Agua Dulce Farm Of San Diego LLC | San Diego, CA 92105 | $3,452 |
88 | Anthony M Kao | Carlsbad, CA 92009 | $3,229 |
89 | Xuan Huong Tran | Huntington Beach, CA 92649 | $2,860 |
90 | Raul Jaquez Three Sons Farm | Ramona, CA 92065 | $2,668 |
91 | Elizabeth Ann Kenny | Oceanside, CA 92057 | $2,578 |
92 | Jonathan Pearson | Seattle, WA 98117 | $2,457 |
93 | Thomas P Page | Ramona, CA 92065 | $2,383 |
94 | David Carpenter | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $2,382 |
95 | Kachuck Enterprises Inc | Valley Village, CA 91607 | $2,345 |
96 | Vertical Acres LLC | Studio City, CA 91604 | $2,066 |
97 | Houman Dahi | San Diego, CA 92130 | $2,014 |
98 | Ruben Barraza | Fallbrook, CA 92088 | $2,013 |
99 | Jeffrey Dillman | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $1,934 |
100 | Wally Hall | Nuevo, CA 92567 | $1,436 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”