Farm Subsidy information
San Diego County, California
Total Subsidies in San Diego County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 849
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Diego County, California totaled $102,061,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Witman Ranch Inc & Arlington Heights Citrus Co Inc | Escondido, CA 92033 | $395,771 |
22 | Israel J And Rhoda S Kachuck Living Trust | Valley Village, CA 91607 | $372,655 |
23 | Valdivia Farms Inc | Carlsbad, CA 92008 | $372,458 |
24 | Marquart Bonsall Ranch LLC | Escondido, CA 92026 | $366,569 |
25 | Warren Hills LLC | San Clemente, CA 92674 | $352,804 |
26 | Witman Ranch Inc | Escondido, CA 92033 | $351,240 |
27 | Resendiz Brothers Protea Growers | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $327,401 |
28 | Valley Heights Ranch Ltd | San Luis Rey, CA 92068 | $320,931 |
29 | Oakley Honey Farms LLC | El Cajon, CA 92022 | $317,929 |
30 | Cal Fresh Tomato Growers, Inc | Oceanside, CA 92057 | $307,752 |
31 | Desert Theater Nursery LLC | Escondido, CA 92026 | $291,316 |
32 | Fred M Williamson | Carlsbad, CA 92008 | $290,568 |
33 | Sun Grown Organic Distributors | San Diego, CA 92154 | $285,285 |
34 | David C Farmer | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $284,662 |
35 | Be Wise Ranch Inc | Escondido, CA 92025 | $279,944 |
36 | Kendall Farms Lp | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $271,401 |
37 | Serrato Farm Labor Contractors | Pauma Valley, CA 92061 | $269,363 |
38 | D&e Propegators Inc Dba Fox Point | Encinitas, CA 92024 | $264,518 |
39 | Jonathan Park Developement | Temecula, CA 92593 | $261,533 |
40 | San Diego Growers Inc | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $250,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”