Farm Subsidy information

San Diego County, California

Total Subsidies in San Diego County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 849

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Diego County, California totaled $102,061,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Witman Ranch Inc & Arlington Heights Citrus Co IncEscondido, CA 92033$395,771
22Israel J And Rhoda S Kachuck Living TrustValley Village, CA 91607$372,655
23Valdivia Farms IncCarlsbad, CA 92008$372,458
24Marquart Bonsall Ranch LLCEscondido, CA 92026$366,569
25Warren Hills LLCSan Clemente, CA 92674$352,804
26Witman Ranch IncEscondido, CA 92033$351,240
27Resendiz Brothers Protea GrowersFallbrook, CA 92028$327,401
28Valley Heights Ranch LtdSan Luis Rey, CA 92068$320,931
29Oakley Honey Farms LLCEl Cajon, CA 92022$317,929
30Cal Fresh Tomato Growers, IncOceanside, CA 92057$307,752
31Desert Theater Nursery LLCEscondido, CA 92026$291,316
32Fred M WilliamsonCarlsbad, CA 92008$290,568
33Sun Grown Organic DistributorsSan Diego, CA 92154$285,285
34David C FarmerValley Center, CA 92082$284,662
35Be Wise Ranch IncEscondido, CA 92025$279,944
36Kendall Farms LpFallbrook, CA 92028$271,401
37Serrato Farm Labor ContractorsPauma Valley, CA 92061$269,363
38D&e Propegators Inc Dba Fox PointEncinitas, CA 92024$264,518
39Jonathan Park DevelopementTemecula, CA 92593$261,533
40San Diego Growers IncFallbrook, CA 92028$250,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag