Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Diego County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 218

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Diego County, California totaled $15,832,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Demler Brothers, LLCRamona, CA 92065$1,000,050
2Mellano Enterprises IncLos Angeles, CA 90014$750,000
3Mountain Meadow Mushroom Farms InEscondido, CA 92026$500,000
4Sunlet Nursery IncFallbrook, CA 92028$500,000
5Terra Bella Nursery, IncSan Diego, CA 92154$500,000
6Grandon Ranch CorpValley Center, CA 92082$448,834
7Ontario Orchids IncVista, CA 92081$420,559
8Cal Fresh Tomato Growers, IncOceanside, CA 92057$307,752
9William Arterberry Dba Farm AcwFallbrook, CA 92028$250,000
10Valdivia Farms IncCarlsbad, CA 92008$250,000
11D&e Propegators Inc Dba Fox PointEncinitas, CA 92024$250,000
12Be Wise Ranch IncEscondido, CA 92025$250,000
13San Diego Growers IncFallbrook, CA 92028$250,000
14West Coast Tomato Growers IncOceanside, CA 92057$250,000
15Fairfield Farms LLCPauma Valley, CA 92061$250,000
16Plant Source, Inc.San Marcos, CA 92069$250,000
17Borrego Farms IncValley Center, CA 92082$250,000
18Israel J And Rhoda S Kachuck Living TrustValley Village, CA 91607$247,655
19Fallbrook Venture OneValley Village, CA 91607$237,802
20Rainforest Flora IncTorrance, CA 90503$236,429

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag