Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in San Joaquin County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 180
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $1,412,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & A Miller Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $11,875 |
22 | Farmington Equity Partners No One | Farmington, CA 95230 | $11,875 |
23 | A & R Owning Farms LLC | Lodi, CA 95240 | $11,875 |
24 | Thomsen Farms Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $11,875 |
25 | Alvarez Farms Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $11,875 |
26 | Tanaka Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95212 | $11,875 |
27 | Ed Thoming & Sons Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $11,875 |
28 | Frank S Solari Inc Dba F & S Solari | Stockton, CA 95212 | $11,875 |
29 | Manna Ranch Inc | Acampo, CA 95220 | $11,875 |
30 | Watanabe Bros Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $11,875 |
31 | Farmington Capital Group | Farmington, CA 95230 | $11,875 |
32 | Pimentel & Son Dairy | Manteca, CA 95337 | $11,875 |
33 | Joseph Due | Ripon, CA 95366 | $11,875 |
34 | Pereira Farms Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $11,875 |
35 | Sakakura Farms LLC | Stockton, CA 95215 | $11,875 |
36 | Mike Van Vliet | Escalon, CA 95320 | $11,875 |
37 | Francisco C Salvador | Escalon, CA 95320 | $11,875 |
38 | Natalie M Salvador | Escalon, CA 95320 | $11,875 |
39 | Celli Ranches Inc | Holt, CA 95234 | $11,875 |
40 | G G Orchards Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”