Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in San Joaquin County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 113
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $317,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Togninali Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $3,501 |
22 | Jolene Giovannoni Dba Giovannoni Farms | Stockton, CA 95206 | $3,494 |
23 | Gerrit Hofman | Manteca, CA 95337 | $3,397 |
24 | Herb Speckman Farms Partnership | Holt, CA 95234 | $3,312 |
25 | Abbate Family Farms | Tracy, CA 95376 | $3,265 |
26 | Berniece L Silva | Stockton, CA 95203 | $3,032 |
27 | D & D Farms | Manteca, CA 95337 | $2,794 |
28 | Silva Bros Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $2,650 |
29 | Holmes Bros | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,558 |
30 | Marinus Doornenbal | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,363 |
31 | Lieske Doornenbal | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,363 |
32 | Coleman Foley Jr | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $2,270 |
33 | Donald And Linda Leinfelder Family Trust | Stockton, CA 95215 | $2,240 |
34 | Mizuno Farms Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $2,234 |
35 | Gregory J Busalacchi Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95205 | $2,228 |
36 | R D C Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $2,208 |
37 | Gary A Abate | Stockton, CA 95206 | $2,096 |
38 | N B Farms - Nat Bacchetti & Nathan Bacchetti Pt Rs | Tracy, CA 95304 | $2,076 |
39 | Ed Nunes Dairy Lp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,037 |
40 | Cerri Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95207 | $1,919 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”