Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,043
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $51,989,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roche Bros Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $278,751 |
42 | V & A Lagorio Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $277,259 |
43 | Nascimento Dairy | Turlock, CA 95382 | $276,614 |
44 | Nissen Dairy Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $270,049 |
45 | R & S Dairy LLC | Escalon, CA 95320 | $260,659 |
46 | Seifert Dairy Lp | Acampo, CA 95220 | $253,735 |
47 | Gerrit Hofman | Manteca, CA 95337 | $250,000 |
48 | Frank Borges | Modesto, CA 95356 | $250,000 |
49 | Frank Chaves | Lodi, CA 95240 | $250,000 |
50 | George Te Velde Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $250,000 |
51 | Marinus Doornenbal | Escalon, CA 95320 | $250,000 |
52 | Anthony W Borba | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $250,000 |
53 | Ornellas Dairy | Tracy, CA 95304 | $250,000 |
54 | Lieske Doornenbal | Escalon, CA 95320 | $250,000 |
55 | Jasbir S Musafar | Sunnyvale, CA 94085 | $250,000 |
56 | Arlan Vander Woude Delta Woods Dairy | Tracy, CA 95304 | $250,000 |
57 | John A Machado Dairy Farms | Ripon, CA 95366 | $250,000 |
58 | Koolhaas Trust Dairy | Ripon, CA 95366 | $250,000 |
59 | Ds Farms Lp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $250,000 |
60 | Machado Family Farms Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $239,720 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”