Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 186
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $1,626,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lieske Doornenbal | Escalon, CA 95320 | $10,719 |
42 | Gregory J Busalacchi Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95205 | $10,649 |
43 | Seifert Dairy II Lp | Acampo, CA 95220 | $10,522 |
44 | Mussi Bros Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $10,516 |
45 | D & D Farms | Manteca, CA 95337 | $10,482 |
46 | Tony Noceti | French Camp, CA 95231 | $10,425 |
47 | Ed Nunes Dairy Lp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $10,197 |
48 | Philip Martin | Tracy, CA 95304 | $10,041 |
49 | Holmes Bros | Escalon, CA 95320 | $10,012 |
50 | Raymond Lagorio | Linden, CA 95236 | $9,716 |
51 | Donald And Linda Leinfelder Family Trust | Stockton, CA 95215 | $8,934 |
52 | David Ishizuka | Thornton, CA 95686 | $8,923 |
53 | Silverdale Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $8,252 |
54 | Abbate Family Farms | Tracy, CA 95376 | $8,206 |
55 | Van Exel Dairy | Lodi, CA 95242 | $7,893 |
56 | Vander Schaaf Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $7,585 |
57 | Raymond & Susanne Quaresma Dairy | Manteca, CA 95337 | $7,407 |
58 | N B Farms - Nat Bacchetti & Nathan Bacchetti Pt Rs | Tracy, CA 95304 | $7,308 |
59 | Gregory Pombo | Tracy, CA 95304 | $7,258 |
60 | John A Machado Dairy Farms | Ripon, CA 95366 | $7,144 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”