Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 186
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $1,626,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Prins Dairy Lp | Stockton, CA 95215 | $4,273 |
82 | Arnold Strecker Enterprises Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $4,249 |
83 | Conrad Silva Exemptmarital Deduction Trust | Stockton, CA 95203 | $4,248 |
84 | Eddie F Lucchesi | Lodi, CA 95242 | $4,130 |
85 | Coney Island Farms Inc | Holt, CA 95234 | $4,117 |
86 | Joseph P Bacchetti | Tracy, CA 95304 | $4,067 |
87 | Manuel Da Silva | Escalon, CA 95320 | $4,052 |
88 | Wagner Land Company | Escalon, CA 95320 | $4,052 |
89 | Lindy Bacchetti | Tracy, CA 95376 | $3,953 |
90 | A M Farms | Stockton, CA 95206 | $3,888 |
91 | Leo Van Vliet & Michael Van Vliet Ptrs L & M Farms | Escalon, CA 95320 | $3,888 |
92 | Manuel & Jeannette Borges Dairy Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $3,870 |
93 | R C Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $3,805 |
94 | Arnold A Rothlin III | Manteca, CA 95337 | $3,638 |
95 | John G Kisst Sr | Ripon, CA 95366 | $3,629 |
96 | Tamela Kisst | Ripon, CA 95366 | $3,629 |
97 | Melvino & Madalena Moules | Lodi, CA 95240 | $3,484 |
98 | G & H Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $3,416 |
99 | Passaglia LLC | Stockton, CA 95219 | $3,351 |
100 | Stephen Pellegri & Sons | Tracy, CA 95304 | $3,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”