Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 300

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $11,995,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
141Hal Robertson Farms LLCTracy, CA 95304$16,624
142Matos Bros DairyAcampo, CA 95220$16,523
143G & H DairyEscalon, CA 95320$16,458
144Stanley Enterprises LpGold River, CA 95670$16,359
145Pereira Farms IncTracy, CA 95304$16,122
146George N VierraHolt, CA 95234$15,710
147Pamela Joaquin-vierraHolt, CA 95234$15,710
148Conrad Silva Exemptmarital Deduction TrustStockton, CA 95203$15,706
149Mike MattosTracy, CA 95304$15,384
150Togninali Farms IncStockton, CA 95215$15,353
151Leo Van Vliet & Michael Van Vliet Ptrs L & M FarmsEscalon, CA 95320$15,256
152Jackson Land & Cattle LpLivermore, CA 94551$15,120
153Richard RodriguezStockton, CA 95215$14,635
154Anita J Merlo EstateStockton, CA 95204$14,487
155James & Barbara M De Fremery Rev Trust 1999Knightsen, CA 94548$14,394
156Wagner Land CompanyEscalon, CA 95320$14,339
157Fong Terminous RanchTiburon, CA 94920$14,249
158Arnold Strecker Enterprises IncStockton, CA 95206$13,805
159Anita MerloWoodbridge, CA 95258$13,692
160P & A De Visser Dairy LpEscalon, CA 95320$13,391

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag