Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Joaquin County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 228
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $16,650,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Seifert Dairy Lp | Acampo, CA 95220 | $228,325 |
22 | Stama Winery LLC | Victor, CA 95253 | $222,266 |
23 | Eilers Ranch LLC | Linden, CA 95236 | $220,326 |
24 | De Boer Farms Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $215,967 |
25 | G G Orchards Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $215,169 |
26 | Jasbir S Musafar | Sunnyvale, CA 94085 | $210,738 |
27 | Relm Properties LLC | Ripon, CA 95366 | $205,117 |
28 | Mello Ranch | Waterford, CA 95386 | $200,805 |
29 | Vander Veen & Moret | Manteca, CA 95336 | $191,418 |
30 | Phippen Bros Lp | Ripon, CA 95366 | $187,518 |
31 | Fredriks Almond Farms Inc | Manteca, CA 95337 | $176,406 |
32 | Frank And Carol Borba Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $175,178 |
33 | Steve Chinchiolo | Stockton, CA 95205 | $170,971 |
34 | Santini Ranch LLC | Escalon, CA 95320 | $167,254 |
35 | Srs Ventures | Clements, CA 95227 | $160,085 |
36 | David Van Vliet | Ripon, CA 95366 | $152,835 |
37 | Nissen Dairy Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $152,330 |
38 | Nascimento Dairy | Turlock, CA 95382 | $149,722 |
39 | Vernon Gogna Farms | Stockton, CA 95215 | $139,442 |
40 | A & M Bogetti Bros Inc | Vernalis, CA 95385 | $138,250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”