Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 300

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $11,995,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
1Machado Dairy FarmsManteca, CA 95337$289,666
2Hwy 12 Farms IncStockton, CA 95219$285,009
3Graydon & Virginia Nichols Family Revocable TrustPalm Desert, CA 92260$255,196
4David RobertsonLinden, CA 95236$246,239
5Leisha RobertsonLinden, CA 95236$246,239
6Seifert Dairy II LpAcampo, CA 95220$244,658
7Dutra Farms IncManteca, CA 95337$235,602
8George Biagi JrStockton, CA 95219$230,762
9Frank N Rocha Dairy L PEscalon, CA 95320$224,286
10Arnaudo Bros LpTracy, CA 95304$203,354
11Berniece L SilvaStockton, CA 95203$197,936
12John A Machado Dairy FarmsRipon, CA 95366$191,275
13Raymond & Susanne Quaresma DairyManteca, CA 95337$182,162
14Fred A Douma Dairy PartnershipTracy, CA 95304$181,341
15Ed RobertsonLinden, CA 95236$173,491
16George Te Velde Jr - The Te Velde Survivor's TrustModesto, CA 95356$172,400
17Frank MillsLodi, CA 95242$168,572
18E & A BiscaiaThornton, CA 95686$166,464
19Ensher Alexander & Barsoom IncSacramento, CA 95811$164,495
20L & R Mussi FarmsStockton, CA 95206$162,544

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag