Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 277

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $9,735,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
21Richard ShiffrarNipomo, CA 93444$146,249
22Duane BaxleyPaso Robles, CA 93446$141,150
23S Kobara And SonsArroyo Grande, CA 93420$135,734
24Michael MasseySan Miguel, CA 93451$135,721
25Holland America Flowers, LLCArroyo Grande, CA 93420$133,647
26J B JaureguyPaso Robles, CA 93446$117,917
27Sill Cattle CoPaso Robles, CA 93446$99,149
28Carrizo Cattle LLCSanta Margarita, CA 93453$97,931
29Arrowweed LivestockPaso Robles, CA 93446$96,243
30Third Loop PartnersPaso Robles, CA 93446$93,594
31Massey Davis LivestockTempleton, CA 93465$91,363
32Santa Margarita Cattle Company LLCSanta Margarita, CA 93453$90,483
33Teixeira Cattle Company GpPismo Beach, CA 93449$89,664
34Alison GranthamTempleton, CA 93465$86,338
35Cathie TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$86,050
36Rowland TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$85,911
37Clint WhiteShandon, CA 93461$81,706
38Scribner LivestockPaso Robles, CA 93446$76,321
39Justin RhoadesCambria, CA 93428$71,942
40Sill Segura Joint VentureHollister, CA 95023$67,392

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag