Non-insured Disaster Assistance in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 143
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,048,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $12,404 |
22 | , | $11,584 | |
23 | Ruffoni Brothers | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $11,578 |
24 | Wood Ranch LLC | Templeton, CA 93465 | $11,301 |
25 | Tom Block | Shandon, CA 93461 | $10,180 |
26 | Judy Lewis | Creston, CA 93432 | $10,031 |
27 | Porter Ranch Company LLC | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $9,638 |
28 | Simonin Livestock Gp | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $8,896 |
29 | Lazy Jt Land And Cattle Lp | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,787 |
30 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $8,609 |
31 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $8,609 |
32 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,562 |
33 | Robert Rohrer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,527 |
34 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,517 |
35 | Mello Land And Cattle LLC | San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 | $8,164 |
36 | Eugene Machado Family Trust Georgia Charlene Macha | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $8,060 |
37 | Nolan S Brennan | Sonora, CA 95370 | $8,005 |
38 | Wyatt A Duncan | King City, CA 93930 | $7,598 |
39 | James M Hearne | King City, CA 93930 | $7,598 |
40 | Green Valley Cattle Company Lp | Cambria, CA 93428 | $7,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”