Direct Payment Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 319
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $6,270,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beverly Hillman | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $69,522 |
22 | Clarence D Hillman III | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $69,522 |
23 | Kenneth Eng Jr | San Antonio, TX 78229 | $64,817 |
24 | Massey Davis Livestock | Templeton, CA 93465 | $59,001 |
25 | Beck Ranch LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $54,366 |
26 | Santa Margarita Ranch LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $50,380 |
27 | Darway Brothers Gp | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $50,331 |
28 | Robt G Lewis | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $49,630 |
29 | Larry Ravera | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $48,627 |
30 | Thomas E Nunn | Bradley, CA 93426 | $45,656 |
31 | Nola Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $42,722 |
32 | Patricia Twisselman | Cholame, CA 93461 | $41,415 |
33 | T Franklin Twisselman Jr | Cholame, CA 93461 | $41,415 |
34 | Raymond Wiebe | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $37,952 |
35 | Loren Mcwilliams | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $37,879 |
36 | Lonnie Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $37,195 |
37 | Pierre Lahargou | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $35,872 |
38 | 3 K Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $35,830 |
39 | Cedric Grant | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $34,666 |
40 | Kuhnle Properties Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $34,505 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”