Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 212
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $2,852,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $34,406 |
22 | Mello Land And Cattle LLC | San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 | $33,520 |
23 | Green Valley Cattle Company Lp | Cambria, CA 93428 | $33,323 |
24 | Onderdonk Spring Ranch LLC | Pasadena, CA 91105 | $31,823 |
25 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $29,252 |
26 | Wood Ranch LLC | Templeton, CA 93465 | $27,800 |
27 | Centennial Livestock | Fresno, CA 93711 | $26,237 |
28 | Michael Massey | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $26,001 |
29 | Molnar Cattle LLC | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $25,966 |
30 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $25,685 |
31 | J & V Sill Family Trust | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $23,616 |
32 | Robert Soto | Cambria, CA 93428 | $23,259 |
33 | Judy Lewis | Creston, CA 93432 | $22,546 |
34 | Old Creek Ranch Inc | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $21,630 |
35 | Smith Livestock LLC | Shandon, CA 93461 | $20,960 |
36 | So Cattle Company | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $19,591 |
37 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $17,790 |
38 | Kenneth Machado & James Machado Dba 7m Ranch | San Jose, CA 95110 | $17,239 |
39 | James Green | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $17,151 |
40 | Sill Cattle Co | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $17,072 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”