Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2022

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 212

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $2,852,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
2022
21Mark MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$34,406
22Mello Land And Cattle LLCSan Luis Obispo, CA 93406$33,520
23Green Valley Cattle Company LpCambria, CA 93428$33,323
24Onderdonk Spring Ranch LLCPasadena, CA 91105$31,823
25Robert K MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$29,252
26Wood Ranch LLCTempleton, CA 93465$27,800
27Centennial LivestockFresno, CA 93711$26,237
28Michael MasseySan Miguel, CA 93451$26,001
29Molnar Cattle LLCCayucos, CA 93430$25,966
30Michael R StroussPaso Robles, CA 93446$25,685
31J & V Sill Family TrustBakersfield, CA 93314$23,616
32Robert SotoCambria, CA 93428$23,259
33Judy LewisCreston, CA 93432$22,546
34Old Creek Ranch IncCayucos, CA 93430$21,630
35Smith Livestock LLCShandon, CA 93461$20,960
36So Cattle CompanyPaso Robles, CA 93446$19,591
37Bitterwater Land & CattlePaso Robles, CA 93446$17,790
38Kenneth Machado & James Machado Dba 7m RanchSan Jose, CA 95110$17,239
39James GreenSan Miguel, CA 93451$17,151
40Sill Cattle CoPaso Robles, CA 93446$17,072

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag