Non-insured Disaster Assistance in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 143
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,048,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ruffoni Farming And Management LLC | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $7,358 |
42 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $6,995 |
43 | Clayton A Grant | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $6,995 |
44 | Arrowweed Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $6,957 |
45 | Old Creek Ranch Inc | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $6,784 |
46 | Dakota Gene Rambo Rodriguez | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $6,368 |
47 | Bailey Blake | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $5,857 |
48 | Dean A Wineman | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $5,799 |
49 | William Ernst | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $5,617 |
50 | Lori B Pope | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $5,585 |
51 | Tom Foss | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $5,554 |
52 | Alison Grantham | Templeton, CA 93465 | $5,530 |
53 | Brian C Ruggles | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $5,256 |
54 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $5,168 |
55 | Scott Raven | Selma, CA 93662 | $4,691 |
56 | Charlyse Raven | Selma, CA 93662 | $4,691 |
57 | Cody Lee Keller | Harmony, CA 93435 | $4,364 |
58 | John M Hurl | Troy, ID 83871 | $3,917 |
59 | Sill Cattle Co | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,859 |
60 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,716 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”