Counter Cyclical Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 166
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John W Richardson | Agoura Hills, CA 91301 | $2,714 |
42 | Kuhnle Properties Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,563 |
43 | Dorothy T Peck Flynn | Fresno, CA 93720 | $2,551 |
44 | Ernest A Hahl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,529 |
45 | Cedric Grant | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,509 |
46 | Pine Canyon Ranch Gp | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $2,509 |
47 | Bryant Ranches | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $2,352 |
48 | Lehnhoff Farms | Templeton, CA 93465 | $2,246 |
49 | Dora J Schroeder | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,161 |
50 | Noel A Ryan | Creston, CA 93432 | $2,024 |
51 | Raymond Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,902 |
52 | O And D Schroeder Residual Trust Created Utd 0129 | Dorris, CA 96023 | $1,873 |
53 | Mary N Jones | Brea, CA 92821 | $1,861 |
54 | Kenneth White | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,713 |
55 | Timothy Testerman | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,647 |
56 | Ian Irving Mcmillan II | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,641 |
57 | John M Hurl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,620 |
58 | Johna Hurl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,620 |
59 | Marion D White Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,523 |
60 | Clayton O White | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $1,498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”