Total Disaster Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,492

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $93,673,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
41Rj Livestock LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$424,394
42Edna Valley Farming Company LLCArroyo Grande, CA 93421$423,777
43Larry E FiscaliniCambria, CA 93428$421,679
44Carrizo Cattle LLCSanta Margarita, CA 93453$417,505
45Onderdonk Spring Ranch LLCPasadena, CA 91105$406,547
46White Ranch CompanyShandon, CA 93461$405,935
47Jose Maria IniguezArroyo Grande, CA 93420$405,604
48Robert SotoCambria, CA 93428$404,752
49Antonio Chavez Revocable TrustNipomo, CA 93444$401,058
50Victor CasasCambria, CA 93428$398,410
51Michael MasseySan Miguel, CA 93451$397,342
52Molnar Cattle LLCCayucos, CA 93430$394,567
53Rowland TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$393,121
54Diane MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$389,076
55Erwin Farms And Nursery IncArroyo Grande, CA 93420$387,851
56Cathie TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$377,832
57Richard L NockSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401$369,017
58Green Valley Cattle Company LpCambria, CA 93428$366,191
59Robert JaureguyPaso Robles, CA 93446$364,672
60Bitterwater Land & CattlePaso Robles, CA 93446$359,166

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag