Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 246

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $5,219,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
1995-2023
41Smith Livestock LLCShandon, CA 93461$31,258
42Robert K MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$29,252
43, $29,121
44So Cattle CompanyPaso Robles, CA 93446$29,022
45Rowland TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$27,415
46Andrew Charles BeemSan Luis Obispo, CA 93406$27,172
47Kate ComptonNipomo, CA 93444$26,673
48Kenneth Machado & James Machado Dba 7m RanchSan Jose, CA 95110$26,368
49Bitterwater Land & CattlePaso Robles, CA 93446$26,231
50Larry E FiscaliniCambria, CA 93428$25,888
51Wineman RanchNipomo, CA 93444$25,867
52Ruffoni BrothersArroyo Grande, CA 93420$25,500
53Nolan S BrennanSonora, CA 95370$24,567
54L Carl GriebArroyo Grande, CA 93420$24,469
55Slack Canyon Cattle Company LLCCayucos, CA 93430$24,148
56Eugene Machado Family Trust Georgia Charlene MachaArroyo Grande, CA 93420$23,934
57Porter Ranch Company LLCArroyo Grande, CA 93420$23,910
58Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004Shandon, CA 93461$23,090
59L V Cattle GpSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401$22,803
60Mike BonnheimPaso Robles, CA 93446$22,469

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag