Loan Deficiency in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 114
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jean Louis Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $4,780 |
42 | Hirschler Farming | Shandon, CA 93461 | $4,544 |
43 | Vivian G White Trustee | Shandon, CA 93461 | $4,350 |
44 | Don Michael Dusi | Templeton, CA 93465 | $4,203 |
45 | John Comino | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $3,846 |
46 | Ted R Cooper Properties | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,518 |
47 | Leonard Franklin | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,518 |
48 | William Ernst | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,383 |
49 | Farris Hillside LLC | Fresno, CA 93720 | $3,240 |
50 | Chimineas Ltd | Houston, TX 77251 | $3,109 |
51 | Continental Vineyards | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,023 |
52 | Burt W Polin | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $2,829 |
53 | Pamela Aldrich Rowan | Fresno, CA 93720 | $2,462 |
54 | Donna Chesebrough | Templeton, CA 93465 | $2,358 |
55 | Robert Chesebrough Jr | Templeton, CA 93465 | $2,358 |
56 | Dewayne Rowlett | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,300 |
57 | Peter G Lowery | Shell Beach, CA 93448 | $2,278 |
58 | John M Hurl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,137 |
59 | Darrell Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,074 |
60 | Stacy Miller | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $2,069 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”