Emergency Conservation Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 129
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,683,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | , | $5,342 | |
62 | Thomas Mcgourty | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $5,085 |
63 | G Bruce Shomler | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $5,000 |
64 | Walter Warren Family Trust | Cambria, CA 93428 | $4,881 |
65 | , | $4,868 | |
66 | Alamo Farming Co | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $4,732 |
67 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $4,650 |
68 | Hugo Victor Gomez Cortes Dba Munak Farms | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $4,314 |
69 | Richard T Mooney Jr | Boise, ID 83709 | $4,198 |
70 | Frank Stout | Ventura, CA 93002 | $4,093 |
71 | , | $3,531 | |
72 | Richard J Peet | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,501 |
73 | Alan Eto | Los Osos, CA 93412 | $3,309 |
74 | , | $3,254 | |
75 | Harry E Blythe Jr | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,223 |
76 | Darrell Skelton | Shandon, CA 93461 | $3,210 |
77 | Ralph N Argano | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $3,202 |
78 | White Ranch Company | Shandon, CA 93461 | $3,200 |
79 | Ed Bernard | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,200 |
80 | Manuel Perez | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $3,130 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”