Counter Cyclical Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 166
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kathy Filipponi | Creston, CA 93432 | $1,496 |
62 | Lois Smith Trust | Concord, CA 94518 | $1,420 |
63 | Robert Pritchard | San Francisco, CA 94116 | $1,368 |
64 | Lindquist Family Partnership | Creston, CA 93432 | $1,336 |
65 | David Barlogio | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,317 |
66 | O Hopper Inc | Templeton, CA 93465 | $1,298 |
67 | Mysterious 1992 Living Trust Aka Cole Rowan | Fresno, CA 93720 | $1,275 |
68 | Pamela Aldrich Rowan | Fresno, CA 93720 | $1,275 |
69 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,184 |
70 | Peter G Lowery | Shell Beach, CA 93448 | $1,166 |
71 | Mcdonald Ranch Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $1,118 |
72 | K Bar 6 Ranch | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $1,063 |
73 | Atillio Busi | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,023 |
74 | Ronald White | Templeton, CA 93465 | $1,023 |
75 | Peter Lowery Living Trust | Santa Monica, CA 90402 | $1,010 |
76 | A J Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $995 |
77 | James K Ouimet | Incline Village, NV 89450 | $928 |
78 | Laura Ouimet | Incline Village, NV 89450 | $928 |
79 | Burt W Polin | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $907 |
80 | Mcmillan Generation Skipping Trus | Shandon, CA 93461 | $879 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”