Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 212
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $2,852,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Chester D Voss | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $12,140 |
62 | Kathy Filipponi | Creston, CA 93432 | $12,114 |
63 | Teixeira Cattle Company Gp | Pismo Beach, CA 93449 | $12,071 |
64 | , | $11,778 | |
65 | Charlyse Raven | Selma, CA 93662 | $11,334 |
66 | Donna L Heer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $11,255 |
67 | Eleanor Truocchio Dba Lone Valley Ranch | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $11,240 |
68 | Patricia Abel | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $11,240 |
69 | Susan Cochrane | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $11,111 |
70 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $11,090 |
71 | Kate Compton | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $10,906 |
72 | Clint White | Shandon, CA 93461 | $10,455 |
73 | Raymond Wiebe | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $10,346 |
74 | Lime Mountain Livestock LLC | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $10,241 |
75 | Keith Miller | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $10,208 |
76 | Silva Ranch | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $9,879 |
77 | Clayton A Grant | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $9,538 |
78 | L Carl Grieb | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $9,532 |
79 | Dean A Wineman | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $9,509 |
80 | John W Taylor Jr | Cambria, CA 93428 | $9,435 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”