Total Commodity Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,174
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $51,486,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William Ernst | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $231,376 |
62 | Martin Martin Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $226,075 |
63 | Clarence D Hillman III | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $224,887 |
64 | Duane Baxley | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $213,475 |
65 | Loren Mcwilliams | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $212,396 |
66 | Tagawa Plant Company | Brighton, CO 80601 | $206,525 |
67 | Ancho Vista Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $201,143 |
68 | Carrie A Peck Trust | Fresno, CA 93720 | $188,048 |
69 | Rmt Enterprises LLC And Chad Wittstrom Third Loop | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $184,847 |
70 | Diane Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $184,595 |
71 | Sill Cattle Co | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $183,299 |
72 | Arrowweed Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $182,098 |
73 | Pacific Sun Growers Greenhouses, | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $178,303 |
74 | Jeanette Holder-bartleson | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $177,518 |
75 | Benchmark Vineyard Management Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $164,232 |
76 | Larry Ravera | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $162,745 |
77 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $162,702 |
78 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $161,902 |
79 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $160,767 |
80 | Joel Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $146,534 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”