Total Commodity Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,174

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $51,486,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
61William ErnstSan Miguel, CA 93451$231,376
62Martin Martin JaureguyPaso Robles, CA 93447$226,075
63Clarence D Hillman IIIPaso Robles, CA 93447$224,887
64Duane BaxleyPaso Robles, CA 93446$213,475
65Loren McwilliamsPaso Robles, CA 93447$212,396
66Tagawa Plant CompanyBrighton, CO 80601$206,525
67Ancho Vista RanchSanta Margarita, CA 93453$201,143
68Carrie A Peck TrustFresno, CA 93720$188,048
69Rmt Enterprises LLC And Chad Wittstrom Third LoopPaso Robles, CA 93446$184,847
70Diane MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$184,595
71Sill Cattle CoPaso Robles, CA 93446$183,299
72Arrowweed LivestockPaso Robles, CA 93446$182,098
73Pacific Sun Growers Greenhouses,Nipomo, CA 93444$178,303
74Jeanette Holder-bartlesonArroyo Grande, CA 93420$177,518
75Benchmark Vineyard Management IncPaso Robles, CA 93447$164,232
76Larry RaveraPaso Robles, CA 93446$162,745
77Cathie TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$162,702
78Miller Moth LLCSan Miguel, CA 93451$161,902
79Rowland TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$160,767
80Joel TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$146,534

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag