Emergency Conservation Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 129
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,683,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | , | $3,113 | |
82 | Ocie Lewis | Maricopa, CA 93252 | $3,000 |
83 | Joe C Brown | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $2,877 |
84 | Frank Lloyd | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $2,848 |
85 | Chad J Rava | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $2,743 |
86 | Domingos Garcia | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $2,707 |
87 | Charles Glines | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $2,672 |
88 | Charlene Baczkiewicz | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $2,672 |
89 | Hugo Diaz | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $2,670 |
90 | Edward Quaresma And Sons | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $2,650 |
91 | Wilson Ranches Inc | Templeton, CA 93465 | $2,646 |
92 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $2,572 |
93 | Patrick Molnar | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $2,536 |
94 | Robert Johns | Covina, CA 91722 | $2,496 |
95 | Live Oak Vineyard | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $2,397 |
96 | Ochoa Farming Inc | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $2,289 |
97 | Estrella River Orchards | Hanford, CA 93230 | $2,240 |
98 | , | $2,176 | |
99 | Larry E Fiscalini | Cambria, CA 93428 | $2,144 |
100 | Margarita Cattle Co | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $1,999 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”