Loan Deficiency in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 114
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Arthur Von Dollen | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $720 |
82 | Jerry Mendes | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $659 |
83 | Fraser Macgillivray | Santa Barbara, CA 93105 | $628 |
84 | Frank S Wicks III | Shandon, CA 93461 | $579 |
85 | Robert L Walters | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $570 |
86 | Norma J Walters | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $548 |
87 | Will Birks | Templeton, CA 93465 | $548 |
88 | Ben Maddalena | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $529 |
89 | Scott W Patterson | Agoura Hills, CA 91301 | $425 |
90 | Aldrick Peck Trust | Fresno, CA 93720 | $412 |
91 | Colleen Hayes | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $389 |
92 | Brazil Farming Company Gp | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $370 |
93 | Arita Lynn Ditchik | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $350 |
94 | Frank Muscia | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $329 |
95 | Robert Stern | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $307 |
96 | Bertrand Cooper | Templeton, CA 93465 | $292 |
97 | Atillio Busi | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $277 |
98 | Jon W Cooper | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $276 |
99 | James Hill | Hayden, ID 83835 | $153 |
100 | John A Galuppo Trust | Templeton, CA 93465 | $153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”