Total Commodity Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 370
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $4,895,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert Rohrer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $11,618 |
82 | Santa Margarita Cattle Company LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $10,814 |
83 | Richard S Dusi | Templeton, CA 93465 | $10,794 |
84 | Windrose Inc. | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $10,255 |
85 | Susan Lyon Dba Cottontail Creek Ranch | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $10,093 |
86 | Barr Creekside Vineyard LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $10,019 |
87 | Dave Silva | Templeton, CA 93465 | $9,958 |
88 | Eugene Machado Family Trust Georgia Charlene Macha | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $9,953 |
89 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $9,803 |
90 | Rosalba Ponce | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $9,564 |
91 | Christopher Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $9,512 |
92 | Fidelina Maldonado | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $9,499 |
93 | Destiny Vineyards LLC | Chatsworth, CA 91313 | $9,429 |
94 | Marcia C Rudnick | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $9,409 |
95 | So Cattle Company | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $9,357 |
96 | Larry E Fiscalini | Cambria, CA 93428 | $9,077 |
97 | Scribner Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $9,068 |
98 | Larry Ravera | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,866 |
99 | Claude Loftus | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,450 |
100 | Clayton A Grant | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $8,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”