Counter Cyclical Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 166
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Evelyn H Little | Branson, MT 65616 | $342 |
102 | Robb Eidemiller | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $334 |
103 | Keith M Harnish | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $319 |
104 | Benjamin Jones | Shelter Island Heigh, NY 11965 | $291 |
105 | Joe Shiffrar | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $289 |
106 | Mary A Lindberg | Creston, CA 93432 | $288 |
107 | John Comino | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $278 |
108 | Filipponi And Thompson Partnershi | Creston, CA 93432 | $264 |
109 | Robert Rohrer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $253 |
110 | Richard Rohrer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $249 |
111 | Linda Cognasi | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $249 |
112 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $244 |
113 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $244 |
114 | Florence R Anderson | Dillon, MT 59725 | $235 |
115 | Darway Brothers Gp | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $228 |
116 | Jeanne Shannon | Santa Ynez, CA 93460 | $220 |
117 | Shannon Family Trust | Santa Ynez, CA 93460 | $220 |
118 | Cyndra J White | Shandon, CA 93461 | $215 |
119 | Milene Radford | Templeton, CA 93465 | $211 |
120 | Carl Linn | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”