Deficiency Payment in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 149
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $378,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mcmillan Generation Skipping Trus | Shandon, CA 93461 | $67 |
102 | Mary Kay Parravano | Carmel, CA 93923 | $58 |
103 | Norman Magenot | Benicia, CA 94510 | $58 |
104 | Rosalie Maginot | Roseville, CA 95747 | $58 |
105 | Tom Mora | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $56 |
106 | Edna V Krivacek | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $54 |
107 | Douglas Diefenderfer | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $45 |
108 | Robert W Henderson | Altadena, CA 91001 | $42 |
109 | Joseph R Mathewson | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | $42 |
110 | Marilyn M Henderson | Altadena, CA 91001 | $42 |
111 | Sheila E Mathewson | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | $42 |
112 | Peter J Lilla | Creston, CA 93432 | $40 |
113 | Burt W Polin | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $36 |
114 | Atillio Busi | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $32 |
115 | Hobson Bros Pkg Co | Ventura, CA 93002 | $28 |
116 | Charles A Pritchard | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $25 |
117 | Robert Pritchard | San Francisco, CA 94116 | $25 |
118 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $20 |
119 | Muriel Ouimet Living Trust | Incline Village, NV 89452 | $19 |
120 | Harold Walsh | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $19 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”