Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 212
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $2,852,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rick Machado | Shandon, CA 93461 | $7,084 |
102 | Pete Melero | Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 | $6,990 |
103 | Tom Foss | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $6,960 |
104 | Kathleen Marquart | Templeton, CA 93465 | $6,777 |
105 | Bailey Blake | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $6,633 |
106 | Robert Hartzell | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $6,606 |
107 | Twisselman Farms | Shandon, CA 93461 | $6,606 |
108 | Wyatt A Duncan | King City, CA 93930 | $6,589 |
109 | James M Hearne | King City, CA 93930 | $6,589 |
110 | Sharon Henslin | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $6,579 |
111 | Kimberly Burton | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $6,579 |
112 | Joan L Schleicher | Cambria, CA 93428 | $6,483 |
113 | Flying E Ranch | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $6,266 |
114 | William Fischbeck | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $6,244 |
115 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $6,219 |
116 | Kevin Wagster | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $6,196 |
117 | Cossa & Sons Gp | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $6,038 |
118 | Sam Higgins | Cambria, CA 93428 | $6,019 |
119 | Lori B Pope | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $5,949 |
120 | John J Maino | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $5,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”