Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 220
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,447,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Sharon Henslin | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,900 |
122 | Anthony Stornetta | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $1,898 |
123 | Kimberly Burton | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,892 |
124 | Kathryn Maino | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $1,877 |
125 | L Carl Grieb | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $1,869 |
126 | John J Maino | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $1,859 |
127 | Beverly Hillman | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $1,798 |
128 | Silva Ranch | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $1,794 |
129 | William Ernst | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $1,792 |
130 | Tanner Dye | Templeton, CA 93465 | $1,785 |
131 | Tom Foss | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,782 |
132 | Larry Brooks | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,774 |
133 | Chad W Davis | Creston, CA 93432 | $1,745 |
134 | Sarah Estrada | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $1,732 |
135 | Raymond Wiebe | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,710 |
136 | William Fischbeck | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $1,677 |
137 | Ruffoni Farming And Management LLC | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $1,663 |
138 | Wineman Los Alisos Corp | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $1,637 |
139 | Donna L Heer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,627 |
140 | Katherine S Varian | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $1,623 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”