Counter Cyclical Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 166
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Scott W Patterson | Agoura Hills, CA 91301 | $197 |
122 | Glen Mcwilliams Dba Premier Ag Pr | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $191 |
123 | Dewayne Rowlett | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $187 |
124 | Eugene W Ernst | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $181 |
125 | Violet Ernst | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $179 |
126 | Lee A Davis Trustee For The W Atk | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $174 |
127 | Crawford Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $167 |
128 | Bertrand Cooper | Templeton, CA 93465 | $162 |
129 | Ruth Von Dollen | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $160 |
130 | Kenneth L Lauridsen - Dorothy Mar | Fresno, CA 93720 | $118 |
131 | Jerold R White Revocable Trust Dated July 25 2007 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $113 |
132 | Donna Chesebrough | Templeton, CA 93465 | $109 |
133 | Robert Chesebrough Jr | Templeton, CA 93465 | $109 |
134 | Wineman Ranch | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $96 |
135 | Jerry Linthicum | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $93 |
136 | Arita Lynn Ditchik | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $91 |
137 | James Hill | Hayden, ID 83835 | $91 |
138 | John A Galuppo Trust | Templeton, CA 93465 | $91 |
139 | Russell Hall | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $84 |
140 | Vivian G White Trustee | Shandon, CA 93461 | $77 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”