Farm Subsidy information
San Luis Obispo County, California
Total Subsidies in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,292
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $286,065,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mike Bonnheim | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $356,549 |
142 | Henry Twisselman | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $355,288 |
143 | Teresa Mejia | Grover Beach, CA 93433 | $353,127 |
144 | Wineman Ranch | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $351,112 |
145 | Brave Oak Vineyard LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $346,523 |
146 | Maria Isabel Torres | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $346,281 |
147 | Massey Bourdet Livestock | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $343,287 |
148 | Alison Grantham | Templeton, CA 93465 | $340,525 |
149 | Christopher Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $340,143 |
150 | Tom Block | Shandon, CA 93461 | $339,804 |
151 | Ted R Cooper Properties | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $339,628 |
152 | Violet Ernst | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $339,339 |
153 | Teixeira Cattle Company Gp | Pismo Beach, CA 93449 | $336,550 |
154 | Filipe Ranch | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $336,241 |
155 | Morro Creek Ranch Ltd Partnership | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $335,680 |
156 | Benchmark Vineyard Management Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $335,662 |
157 | Raymond Wiebe | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $335,300 |
158 | G D Diefenderfer | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $334,396 |
159 | Humberto De La Paz | Grover Beach, CA 93483 | $331,950 |
160 | Charmaine Velarde | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $331,365 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”