Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $118,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ikeda Bros. | Oceano, CA 93475 | $48,688 |
2 | Turri Ranch & Cattle Co | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $11,984 |
3 | Sam Willis | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $7,000 |
4 | Davis Bros | Templeton, CA 93465 | $7,000 |
5 | Duane Dawes | Templeton, CA 93465 | $3,928 |
6 | George Spacek | Santa Barbara, CA 93105 | $3,500 |
7 | Wm S Blyth | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,500 |
8 | Douglas Goodan | Los Angeles, CA 90027 | $3,500 |
9 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $3,500 |
10 | John Swift | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $3,500 |
11 | Noel A Ryan | Creston, CA 93432 | $3,500 |
12 | Twisselman Grain And Cattle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $3,500 |
13 | Margarita Cattle Co | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $3,500 |
14 | Dean Porter | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,147 |
15 | Evangiline Glass | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $2,381 |
16 | James Maino | San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 | $2,027 |
17 | Rancho Rio Conejo | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $1,768 |
18 | C A Mac Gregor | Cambria, CA 93428 | $1,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”