Farm Subsidy information
San Luis Obispo County, California
Total Subsidies in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 406
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $21,294,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | , | $506,830 | |
2 | Philip R Hammond | Visalia, CA 93291 | $440,722 |
3 | Boneso Vineyards LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $372,745 |
4 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $311,759 |
5 | Justin Rhoades | Cambria, CA 93428 | $278,263 |
6 | Massey Davis Livestock | Templeton, CA 93465 | $278,183 |
7 | Erwin Farms And Nursery Inc | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $257,248 |
8 | Freshway Farms, LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $225,000 |
9 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $200,167 |
10 | Rmt Enterprises LLC And Chad Wittstrom Third Loop | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $187,517 |
11 | Cagliero Vineyards Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $183,190 |
12 | Carrizo Cattle LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $182,143 |
13 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $179,645 |
14 | Benchmark Vineyard Management Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $171,431 |
15 | Twisselman Grain And Cattle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $168,197 |
16 | Rj Livestock LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $162,484 |
17 | , | $152,910 | |
18 | Jd Farming Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $143,569 |
19 | Scribner Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $140,442 |
20 | , | $138,778 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>