Counter Cyclical Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 166
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $507,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Laura Coats Trust | Creston, CA 93432 | $5,067 |
22 | Patricia Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $5,021 |
23 | T Franklin Twisselman Jr | Cholame, CA 93461 | $5,021 |
24 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $4,663 |
25 | Darrell Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $4,641 |
26 | Anna Dow | Ironside, OR 97908 | $4,547 |
27 | Neal J Dow | Prineville, OR 97754 | $4,547 |
28 | Loren Mcwilliams | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $4,476 |
29 | Rinconada Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $3,700 |
30 | K W Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $3,660 |
31 | Spring Ranch | Pasadena, CA 91105 | $3,578 |
32 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,569 |
33 | Eric Stewart | Mc Kittrick, CA 93251 | $3,438 |
34 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $3,393 |
35 | Kenneth Eng Jr | San Antonio, TX 78229 | $3,371 |
36 | Caroline Eng | San Antonio, TX 78229 | $3,371 |
37 | Raymond Wiebe | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,139 |
38 | Continental Vineyards | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $2,910 |
39 | Frances D Kuhnle Living Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,875 |
40 | Larry Ravera | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $2,765 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”