Total Disaster Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,492
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $93,673,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Teresa Mejia | Grover Beach, CA 93433 | $353,127 |
62 | Maria Isabel Torres | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $346,281 |
63 | Morro Creek Ranch Ltd Partnership | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $335,680 |
64 | Humberto De La Paz | Grover Beach, CA 93483 | $331,950 |
65 | Alcantar Brothers Farming | Oceano, CA 93445 | $329,444 |
66 | Johansing Farms LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $326,148 |
67 | Larry Ravera | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $325,496 |
68 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $324,812 |
69 | Scribner Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $320,277 |
70 | Mike Bonnheim | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $318,058 |
71 | Stephen R Onderdonk | Pasadena, CA 91105 | $316,292 |
72 | Tom Block | Shandon, CA 93461 | $311,265 |
73 | Drake's Royal Farms | San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 | $310,870 |
74 | Norma Casas | Cambria, CA 93428 | $310,096 |
75 | Charmaine Velarde | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $309,695 |
76 | Wilson Ranches Inc | Templeton, CA 93465 | $306,731 |
77 | Daniel Camacho | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $301,324 |
78 | Maria Eguiluz | Grover Beach, CA 93433 | $293,027 |
79 | Hermelindo Casas | Templeton, CA 93465 | $291,242 |
80 | Wineman Ranch | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $290,988 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”