Total Conservation Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 65
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,024,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $121,997 |
2 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $92,390 |
3 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $67,758 |
4 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $53,040 |
5 | White Ranch Company | Shandon, CA 93461 | $52,577 |
6 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $43,712 |
7 | Michael Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $38,929 |
8 | Kuhnle Properties Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $37,500 |
9 | Denise C Kuhnle | Templeton, CA 93465 | $37,427 |
10 | Ronald Hodel | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $34,094 |
11 | Mark Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $32,238 |
12 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $23,616 |
13 | Mckee Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $22,774 |
14 | Ernst Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $22,620 |
15 | Garrett Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $21,855 |
16 | , | $21,855 | |
17 | Raymond And Cynthia Twisselman Re | Shandon, CA 93461 | $21,554 |
18 | Frank D Kuhnle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $17,429 |
19 | Ian Irving Mcmillan II | Shandon, CA 93461 | $15,573 |
20 | Mcmillan Generation Skipping Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $15,572 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>