Total Conservation Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 488

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $62,973,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1L Y 7 CompanySanta Margarita, CA 93453$2,257,915
2White Ranch CompanyShandon, CA 93461$2,155,760
3Clark BrothersPaso Robles, CA 93446$1,846,826
4Lacey LivestockPaso Robles, CA 93447$1,750,262
5K W RanchSanta Margarita, CA 93453$1,571,518
6Bitterwater Land & CattlePaso Robles, CA 93446$1,515,767
7Robert K MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$1,329,381
8Ronald HodelPaso Robles, CA 93446$1,152,847
9Diane MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$981,337
10Charles W. Kuhnle And SonsSanta Margarita, CA 93453$980,865
11Joseph D KuhnleShandon, CA 93461$821,852
12Carrie A Peck TrustFresno, CA 93720$819,151
13Kuhnle Properties TrustShandon, CA 93461$806,448
14Michael TwisselmanShandon, CA 93461$775,346
15Janet KlockTempe, AZ 85283$751,908
16Sill Properties IncBakersfield, CA 93301$693,525
17Miller & KingPaso Robles, CA 93446$691,304
18Lonnie TwisselmanShandon, CA 93461$680,391
19Kenneth Eng JrSan Antonio, TX 78229$669,914
20Rowland TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$628,076

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag