Total Commodity Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 370
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $4,895,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Sill Cattle Co | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $42,191 |
| 22 | F & F Farms LLC | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $41,793 |
| 23 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $41,297 |
| 24 | Lilian L Massey | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $41,080 |
| 25 | J & V Sill Family Trust | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $40,668 |
| 26 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $40,013 |
| 27 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $38,165 |
| 28 | Santiago M Santillan | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $34,620 |
| 29 | Lourdes Santillan | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $34,620 |
| 30 | Manuel Bautista | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $34,500 |
| 31 | Cmac Properties LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $32,275 |
| 32 | Old Creek Ranch Inc | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $31,856 |
| 33 | Sill Properties Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93301 | $30,118 |
| 34 | Wolff Vineyards LLC | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $30,038 |
| 35 | Stepladder Farmstead Creamery LLC | Cambria, CA 93428 | $30,010 |
| 36 | Rancho Picacho Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $29,613 |
| 37 | Sill Segura Joint Venture | Hollister, CA 95023 | $29,376 |
| 38 | L & G Cattle, LLC | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $29,260 |
| 39 | Clint White | Shandon, CA 93461 | $27,256 |
| 40 | Charlie Kuhnle III | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $25,945 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf