Farm Subsidy information
Santa Barbara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Barbara County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 94
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $6,807,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roy Bognuda Dba Bognuda Sons Livestock | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $35,930 |
22 | Alfonso Gonzalez- The Alfonso Gon | Oxnard, CA 93030 | $31,877 |
23 | La Brea Ranch LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $31,752 |
24 | Ceferino Cheng | Torrance, CA 90503 | $31,523 |
25 | , | $30,059 | |
26 | Donlon Widle Cattle Company, LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $29,984 |
27 | J & A Farming & Ranching | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $29,736 |
28 | Roy Bognuda Jr | Orcutt, CA 93457 | $29,728 |
29 | El Rancho Espanol De Cuyama, No. 1, LLC | New Cuyama, CA 93254 | $27,500 |
30 | , | $24,388 | |
31 | Testaney Inc | Solvang, CA 93463 | $23,436 |
32 | Robert Acquistapace- Dba Tepusquet Cattle Co | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $23,065 |
33 | Justin Garcin | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $21,070 |
34 | John Donati | Arvin, CA 93203 | $20,238 |
35 | Barry M Semler | Santa Barbara, CA 93120 | $20,151 |
36 | Tom Thompson | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $19,151 |
37 | Jubel Russell | New Cuyama, CA 93254 | $18,522 |
38 | , | $15,694 | |
39 | , | $12,950 | |
40 | Pata & Pata | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $12,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”