Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 186
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $23,211,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | H & R Souza Inc | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $250,000 |
42 | Jmc Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $250,000 |
43 | Cjj Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $250,000 |
44 | Oscar Sanchez Dba Ixtapa Farms | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $246,516 |
45 | De Bernardi Bros | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $222,785 |
46 | Sierra Del Tigre Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $206,532 |
47 | B & D Farms Inc | Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 | $200,000 |
48 | Realito Berry Farms Inc | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $199,005 |
49 | Ellwood Ranch Inc. | Goleta, CA 93117 | $179,958 |
50 | Ocean Breeze International | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $163,388 |
51 | M. Chavez & Sons Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $158,370 |
52 | Cecilio Marquez | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $148,130 |
53 | Del Campo Berry Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $138,608 |
54 | Savino Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $137,908 |
55 | Roy Bognuda Dba Bognuda Sons Livestock | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $135,405 |
56 | New Century Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $131,873 |
57 | Evodio Antonio Perez | Los Alamos, CA 93440 | $114,252 |
58 | Giorgi Ranches Inc | Goleta, CA 93117 | $103,827 |
59 | Golden Valley Berries Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $100,663 |
60 | Socal Berry Growers LLC | Ventura, CA 93003 | $91,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”