Farm Subsidy information
Santa Barbara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 878
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $143,296,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Sierra Del Tigre Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $456,532 |
| 62 | Kg Berry Farms LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $449,609 |
| 63 | Doug Hermance | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $444,955 |
| 64 | Branquinho Farming & Ranching LLC | Los Alamos, CA 93440 | $428,284 |
| 65 | Emery Johnston | New Cuyama, CA 93254 | $411,454 |
| 66 | Perkins Ranch | Ventura, CA 93001 | $400,967 |
| 67 | Socal Berry Growers LLC | Ventura, CA 93003 | $391,476 |
| 68 | Agpro, Inc. | Santa Barbara, CA 93111 | $382,084 |
| 69 | New Century Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $381,873 |
| 70 | Maretti & Minetti Rch Co | Guadalupe, CA 93434 | $374,676 |
| 71 | Jesus Moreno | Lompoc, CA 93438 | $368,453 |
| 72 | Evodio Antonio Perez | Los Alamos, CA 93440 | $364,252 |
| 73 | Del Campo Berry Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $363,292 |
| 74 | Hayes Brothers Ranches | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $361,671 |
| 75 | Estela Guzman | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $361,097 |
| 76 | Golden Valley Berries Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $355,195 |
| 77 | Dulce M Brooks | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $354,992 |
| 78 | Roy Bognuda Dba Bognuda Sons Livestock | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $347,765 |
| 79 | Rick Machado | Shandon, CA 93461 | $347,110 |
| 80 | Agriculture Envision U.s. Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $339,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
