Farm Subsidy information
Santa Barbara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Barbara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 188
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $8,336,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | G.c. Farming Inc. | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $78,854 |
| 22 | Rancho Canada De Los Pinos, LLC | Placentia, CA 92870 | $78,613 |
| 23 | Carpinteria Fruit Company LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $71,680 |
| 24 | Arc Vineyard LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $61,439 |
| 25 | Juanita Aguilar Hernandez Dba- Garcia Farming | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $59,738 |
| 26 | Paulino Lopez Martinez | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $54,667 |
| 27 | Filemon Jarquin Dba Jarquin Farms | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $54,134 |
| 28 | Ted Chamberlin Ranch LLC | Los Olivos, CA 93441 | $51,852 |
| 29 | Paramount Panels, Inc. Dba Rio Vista Vineyard | Ontario, CA 91761 | $50,772 |
| 30 | Karam Pistachio Farm Inc | Newport Beach, CA 92658 | $50,055 |
| 31 | Broccoli Queen, LLC | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $49,259 |
| 32 | Mauracher Ranch Corp | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $47,751 |
| 33 | Ferniza Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $47,435 |
| 34 | Ricardo Rojas | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $46,996 |
| 35 | Stow Land Company LLC | Goleta, CA 93116 | $44,753 |
| 36 | Inelba Romero-dba Milpa Farming | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $44,246 |
| 37 | La Patera Cattle Company | Goleta, CA 93116 | $41,060 |
| 38 | Calhaven LLC | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $40,582 |
| 39 | Santa Barbara Orchid Estate Inc | Santa Barbara, CA 93111 | $40,489 |
| 40 | Kessler Haak Vineyards LLC | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $39,619 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf