Farm Subsidy information
Santa Clara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 402
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $38,274,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ffm Mushrooms, Inc. | San Martin, CA 95046 | $321,903 |
22 | Leland P Belli | San Jose, CA 95127 | $307,822 |
23 | Mathis Cattle Inc | Buellton, CA 93427 | $296,372 |
24 | Al Mangini | San Jose, CA 95124 | $291,250 |
25 | South Pacific Orchids Inc | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $290,350 |
26 | Agco Hay LLC | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $288,710 |
27 | Richard W Vargas Jr | San Jose, CA 95135 | $279,771 |
28 | Van Dyke Brothers Inc | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $279,389 |
29 | John D Moitozo | Gustine, CA 95322 | $272,314 |
30 | Western Tree Nursery Inc | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $250,000 |
31 | C & F Farms Inc. | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $250,000 |
32 | , | $250,000 | |
33 | G & K Farms Of California Inc | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $240,796 |
34 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $238,180 |
35 | Justin Fields | Coyote, CA 95013 | $232,833 |
36 | Bob Filice | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $208,241 |
37 | Redfern Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $200,583 |
38 | Willoughby Farms Inc | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $200,000 |
39 | Vanguard Farms Inc. | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $189,118 |
40 | South Valley Mushroom Farm Inc. | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $188,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”