Farm Subsidy information
Santa Clara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Clara County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 117
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $3,049,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ledeit Bros Family Properties | San Jose, CA 95173 | $14,954 |
22 | , | $13,284 | |
23 | Leland P Belli | San Jose, CA 95127 | $12,943 |
24 | Vong Farms LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $12,758 |
25 | 101 Equipment Co. | Aromas, CA 95004 | $12,684 |
26 | Joe Chen | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $11,408 |
27 | San Felipe Farms Lp | Hollister, CA 95023 | $11,405 |
28 | Clayton Koopmann | Sunol, CA 94586 | $10,876 |
29 | Xing Hua Zhen | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $10,448 |
30 | Sher Wong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $10,337 |
31 | Kirk Cattle Company LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,339 |
32 | Xay Duc Hoang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $9,325 |
33 | Spade & Plow Organics LLC | San Martin, CA 95046 | $9,262 |
34 | Daniel D Long | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $8,226 |
35 | Everett Sparling | Hollister, CA 95023 | $7,829 |
36 | Borello Farms Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $7,616 |
37 | Helen Hue Loi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $7,520 |
38 | Russell Sanders | Livermore, CA 94550 | $7,371 |
39 | Justin Fields | Coyote, CA 95013 | $6,648 |
40 | William J Donati | Hollister, CA 95023 | $6,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”