Total Commodity Programs in Santa Clara County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 73
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $238,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Da Xiong Tan | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $3,292 |
22 | Cheng Jiu Li | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $3,182 |
23 | Sonny Lo | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $3,161 |
24 | Hong Z Huang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $3,140 |
25 | Han Qiang Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $2,993 |
26 | Kwong Wei Yun | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $2,901 |
27 | An Yang Chen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $2,782 |
28 | Jian C Yu | San Martin, CA 95046 | $2,745 |
29 | Hongan Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $2,296 |
30 | Mark Tamura | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $2,284 |
31 | Shun Heung Kwong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,229 |
32 | Tian Kai Kuang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,212 |
33 | Keith Lo | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,166 |
34 | Chaoan Jiang | San Jose, CA 95122 | $2,078 |
35 | Shou Xiang Li | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $2,051 |
36 | Mei Huan Huang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $2,014 |
37 | Xu Hong Huang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,953 |
38 | Tian Cai Kuang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,901 |
39 | Michael Wong | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,851 |
40 | , | $1,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”