Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Clara County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 70
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $232,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Haoqin Chen | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,711 |
42 | Cui Lan Huang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,665 |
43 | Venh Tang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $1,590 |
44 | Zhao Wang Zhen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,583 |
45 | Fanny Tam | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,514 |
46 | Mr Guohua Xu | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,385 |
47 | Erica Lynn Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,353 |
48 | Song Guang Lin | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,315 |
49 | Huan Lun Guan | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,302 |
50 | Xiao Teng Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $1,291 |
51 | Ping H Cheng | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,276 |
52 | Liang Wei Chen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,234 |
53 | Yip Hing Kwong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,175 |
54 | Rong Zhao Zhou | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,022 |
55 | Sik Kwan Kwong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $971 |
56 | Yao Ming Yu | San Francisco, CA 94124 | $949 |
57 | Qiahua Xie | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $901 |
58 | Bai Wei Huang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $848 |
59 | Liang Qiang Chen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $832 |
60 | John Wu | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”