Farm Subsidy information
Santa Clara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 402
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $38,274,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bob Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $186,451 |
42 | Mariani Orchards | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $183,699 |
43 | Ledeit Bros Family Properties | San Jose, CA 95173 | $173,956 |
44 | Heidi M Lackey | Livermore, CA 94550 | $171,505 |
45 | Guo Ping Yuan | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $167,953 |
46 | Mrs Lynn Cooper | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $161,766 |
47 | Marchese Farms | Saratoga, CA 95070 | $158,650 |
48 | Rainforest Farms LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $154,698 |
49 | Jon Cooper | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $145,881 |
50 | Zhou Ping Cai | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $145,609 |
51 | Richard Vargas Livestock, LLC | San Jose, CA 95135 | $142,786 |
52 | Anthony Botelho | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $141,876 |
53 | Rice-sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $136,973 |
54 | An Yang Chen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $134,074 |
55 | Great Farm Inc. | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $129,660 |
56 | Andy's Orchard LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $127,072 |
57 | Robert Coffelt | Hollister, CA 95023 | $126,664 |
58 | Kirk Cattle Company LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $123,408 |
59 | Tilton Ranch Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $122,378 |
60 | Jin Hao Zhou | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $122,362 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”