Farm Subsidy information
Santa Clara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Clara County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 117
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $3,049,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Haoqin Chen | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,711 |
82 | Cui Lan Huang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,665 |
83 | Venh Tang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $1,590 |
84 | Zhao Wang Zhen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,583 |
85 | Lloyd Ray Beadle | Los Gatos, CA 95032 | $1,536 |
86 | Fanny Tam | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,514 |
87 | Mr Guohua Xu | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,385 |
88 | Erica Lynn Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,353 |
89 | , | $1,332 | |
90 | Song Guang Lin | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,315 |
91 | Huan Lun Guan | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,302 |
92 | Xiao Teng Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $1,291 |
93 | Ping H Cheng | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,276 |
94 | Liang Wei Chen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,234 |
95 | Yip Hing Kwong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,175 |
96 | Zachary Robert Estrada | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $1,105 |
97 | Kyle Wolfe | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,086 |
98 | Rong Zhao Zhou | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,022 |
99 | Carrie Kevie | Mt Hamilton, CA 95140 | $1,011 |
100 | Sik Kwan Kwong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”